Northwestern University and Evanston's Only Daily News Source Since 1881

Debating 2016: Education

February 1, 2016

Stocker: Democrats will better invest in education

Stocker%3A+Democrats+will+better+invest+in+education

Education policy affects us, as Northwestern students, in both obvious and subtle ways. From Pell Grants to graduate school, higher education is never far from NU students’ minds. And, even though our own K-12 days are over, within the next two decades many of us will start families and engage the world of preschool, primary and secondary education as parents.

Let’s start from the very beginning: preschool. The primary Democratic contenders are firm believers in accessible early-childhood education. Hillary Clinton announced her support for universal preschool back in June 2015, and Sen. Bernie Sanders sponsored a 2011 bill for universal preschool. Expanding access to preschool education yields impressive results: both low and middle-income students benefit from increased preschool access, resulting in long-term economic benefits as high as $10 for every $1 spent. Universal preschool addresses socioeconomic classroom segregation at the earliest level, and its benefits accrue to all students, from the lowest to highest performing. But despite these benefits, the Republican presidential candidates have either denounced universal preschool as government overreach or stepped back from previous positions of support.

President Obama’s Race to the Top awards states for innovative methods in saving troubled public schools, developing education standards and training effective teachers and administrators. Race to the Top has been a success, delivering results in states across the country. Race to the Top was even a hit with some conservatives, including former Florida governor and current GOP presidential contender Jeb Bush.

Democratic approaches to higher education are crucial to increasing social mobility in the United States. Hillary Clinton’s debt-free college plan and Sen. Sander’s college tuition reform plan — which includes free tuition at public colleges and universities — are necessary steps in this country’s progression to a more egalitarian society. Student loan debt places a massive financial burden on recent college graduates, consuming as much as 10 percent of their gross income. Excessive student debt prevents many college graduates from accruing the benefits of their education, lowering consumption and investment, thereby dragging down the economy.

The preamble of the 2012 Republican Platform declares the American Dream a “dream of equal opportunity for all.” Without equal access to education, from preschool to college, equality of opportunity can never be a reality. Republican education policies threaten to make equality of opportunity little more than a dream. The Democratic Party offers education policy that works toward that vision of equality of opportunity, investing in our nation’s future.

Education policy matters both to our present and future selves. As NU students today, and as future parents, Democratic education policies are the best choice for this country. NU students should vote Democratic for education policy that increases social mobility and builds up our economy.

Alexi Stocker is a Weinberg senior. He can be contacted at [email protected]. If you would like to respond publicly to this column, send a Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. The views expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect the views of all staff members of The Daily Northwestern.

Papastefan: GOP education policy more sustainable, realistic

Papastefan%3A+GOP+education+policy+more+sustainable%2C+realistic

The importance of politics in education simply can’t be ignored. Just look at the past few years, with the Common Core coming under harsh scrutiny, President Obama promising “free” community college and presidential candidate Bernie Sanders one-upping him with the promise of “free” higher education at four-year public institutions. These promises have captured the attention and support of college students across the country, including many here at NU, but unfortunately, they do not add up. Before running to the polls and casting your ballot for Sanders and his education proposal, consider the less glamorous, but much more reasonable, Republican take on education.

Most Republicans agree that Common Core is a broken system. Instead of implementing national standards for education, Republicans support the use of block grants, which allow state and local governments to use federal funding for education as they see best fit. Another key tenet of the Republican education platform is the idea of family literacy programs to improve the reading, language and life skills of low-income families.

As for soaring higher education costs, it is important to consider how we got to this point. In a study published July 2015 by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, it was determined that for every dollar of Federal Direct Subsidized Loans, tuition increased by 65 cents, while Pell Grants prompted a 50-cent-on-the-dollar increase. The study found that, just as banks provided irresponsible loans to homebuyers in 2008, inflating home prices above their worth, a series of congressional acts by a Democratic congress between 2006 and 2008 expanded the line of credit to students, prompting big increases in college tuition. Federal aid is clearly not the solution to make tuition affordable, so to seek to expand on a proven failure in policy would be irresponsible. Sanders’ proposal may sound too good to be true, and that is because it is.

Republican policy provides a sensible, sustainable alternative to “free” tuition. Recognizing that the current system of federal aid is counterintuitive, and that paying for tuition with a tax on Wall Street is volatile and dangerous, the GOP proposes the government serve as an insurance guarantor for the private sector to provide loans to students. The GOP also holds there should be a more transparent, educational process for families to evaluate various programs’ graduation rates, repayment rates and future earnings.

The cost of higher education is out of control. While Democrats seek to win votes by promising expansions on failed policy paid for by unreliable markets, Republicans provide a more reasonable alternative. Americans are not outraged when we are expected to pay for a meal or clothes, so we should not be surprised by the notion that something as valuable as higher education comes at a cost. As of now that cost is too high, but if you vote Republican it could get better.

Grant Papastefan is a Bienen freshman. He can be contacted at [email protected]. If you would like to respond publicly to this column, send a Letter to the Editor to [email protected]. The views expressed in this piece do not necessarily reflect the views of all staff members of The Daily Northwestern.