Gun control debate comes to Northwestern as ASG plans to discuss resolution
Melody Song/The Daily Northwestern
Sophomore Mohamad Akef participates in the gun control debate during the College Democrats meeting. The group also discussed how they would present their views to the Northwestern community.
January 22, 2013
In the wake of multiple school shootings across the country, Northwestern student groups are bringing the gun control debate to campus.
Following President Barack Obama's signature of 23 executive orders on Jan. 16 calling for gun control reform, members of the Associated Student Government presented an impromptu resolution supporting the president’s decision to take action on an issue they plan to discuss at Wednesday’s senate meeting. On Tuesday, campus political groups weighed in on the resolution, just hours after three people were shot at Lone Star College in Texas.
In the interim, ASG has drafted and edited a resolution supporting the president's decision to take action on gun control. ASG members Steven Monacelli, Mike Morgan and Ian Coley co-authored the resolution and emphasized gun control was an issue relevant to the student body because educational environments have recently been the site of several mass shootings. Following the introduction of the resolution at last week’s meeting, NU College Republicans began circulating a petition around campus stating that partisan endorsements are not a part of ASG’s mission.
NU College Republicans president Dane Stier said no student should be “ostracized” by ASG decisions, and the democratic body should steer clear of partisan issues.
"This is a very contentious issue right now," the Weinberg junior said.“We’re trying to make sure that no student is left out of any decisions made by ASG when there’s no reason that they have to be.”
In addition to the petition, which had 56 signatures as of Tuesday night, Stier co-authored a letter to ASG with the president of Students for Liberty, Weinberg junior Justin Moore, and said he may voice his opinion at Wednesday’s meeting.
He said he hopes ASG will strike down this resolution entirely and instead pass a resolution to not comment on politically charged issues in the future. ASG’s history of weighing in on polarizing issues extends from stances on the Vietnam War to climate change.
NU College Democrats also discussed gun control and the draft of ASG’s resolution at their Tuesday night meeting. The group debated the points set forth in Obama’s 23 orders and legislative recommendations and also delved into discussion of how the Second Amendment’s “right to bear arms” clause should be interpreted.
Following the discussion, NU College Democrats co-president Lauren Izaak read a draft of the ASG gun control resolution to the group. Although some students were at first skeptical, the group unanimously supported the legislation after reading the draft.
“It was interesting that the resolution itself actually changed people’s opinions about whether ASG should be allowed to speak on this or not,” Izaak, a Weinberg junior, said.
As Izaak finished reading the resolution, one student exclaimed “I get it now!” and many agreed they previously thought gun control did not fall under ASG’s intended mission.
Even those in the room who oppose many of the Democratic attempts to increase gun control supported the ASG resolution. Weinberg junior Alex Deitchman spoke candidly of his support for the Second Amendment and due process of the law throughout the group’s debate.
“I thought (the resolution) was reasonable,” he said. “It’s a way for Northwestern students to speak in a stronger voice to the political community.”
Deitchman added he thought individual students who opposed the resolution were free to write to their representatives and express that opinion themselves.
As the resolution is slated for discussion as new business at Wednesday’s meeting, ASG Speaker Ani Ajith said he hopes people read the legislation very closely and that it leads to a campus-wide conversation.
“This is obviously a hot button issue,” the Weinberg junior and former Daily staffer said. “Anyone is free to come and speak."
Ajith emphasized ASG had not made any decisions on the resolution yet, as senators thought they needed at least a week to discuss the resolution at the Jan. 26 meeting. If the resolution follows typical ASG procedure and senators do not move the resolution to new business and vote on it on Wednesday, it will be discussed at Wednesday's meeting and then voted on the following week as old business.
"We haven't made a decision yet at all," Ajith said. "We need to examine its relevance."
Correction: A previous version of this story misstated Dane Stier's class. He is a junior. The Daily regrets the error.










A link to the full resolution is below if anyone is interested in reading it for themselves:
http://tinyurl.com/a5aqdg3
[Reply]
Do any of these ASG resolutions amount to anything other than a few select students pontificating for hours on end?
[Reply]
SHOCKING NEW INFORMATION ABOUT IAN COLEY
http://www.iancoley.co.uk/gunshop.html
COULD THIS IAN COLEY SO ADAMANT FOR GUN CONTROL BE THE SAME PROPRIETOR OF IAN COLEY GUNSHOP OF UK??
YOU BE THE JUDGE, NORTHWESTERN!
[Reply]
You have a problem with pontificating ?
[Reply]
After you outlaw guns - be sure to outlaw drugs, prostitution, graft, theft and illegal abortions - then, we'll all live happily ever after without any of these things.
[Reply]
Yes, actually. Due to rules, a part of the resolution was split into a separate piece of legislation that will create a working group to draft a letter and seek other student governments across the Chicago area and the nation to sign on to our letter or pass similar resolutions. Such actions are coordinated and can provide significant pressure and media attention on the issue. While it will not result necessarily in any direct changes on our campus, it has the potential to contribute forcefully to national discourse.
In 2011, ASG did a similar action regarding student protest rights in response to the UC Davis incident. That added pressure to the UC administration and simultaneously caused our administration to reconsider their policies. 16 of the nations top universities signed on to our letter, which is still published online. This is not exactly the same type of issue, but it is one which would hopefully have similar if not greater effects. College student governments have been powerful in national discourse in the past when it came to issues of concern to youth and students, and there is nothing differently about that possibility today.
[Reply]
ba Reply:
January 24th, 2013 at 11:39 am
You are very niave to think that something as small as ASG's ramblings will have any longstanding impact locally or nationally.
[Reply]
ayo Daily! Dane's a junior, not a senior.
[Reply]