Nadkarni: New athletic facility should foster campus unity (and house a water park)

October 16, 2012

About a month ago, Northwestern announced plans for new athletic facilities to reside on the north end of campus, presumably on the lakeside.

Considering I’m friends with Jim Phillips, the vice president of athletics and recreation (A blatant lie, but I have emailed him a couple times), I thought I would throw him and the board of trustees some suggestions on what to include in the new facilities.

My first suggestion would be to house an indoor, Wisconsin Dells-inspired water park in that giant building.

You may wonder what possible benefit an indoor water park could have for Big Ten athletes, but imagine the team bonding that would occur if Drew Crawford helped Dave Sobolewski conquer his fear of those dark tunnel tube rides. When Sobo hits Crawford with a behind the back, no look, under the legs, 360-degree alley-oop from the length of the court — you’ll know where they developed the chemistry.

Also, a late-night dining option in the athletic facility would be nice. Seriously: I’ve lived on South Campus my two years here, and we have Plex late-night. Where do people up north eat late at night?

Does “The Great Room” really exist, or is it part of the imagination of FBI special agent Dale Cooper? And I love Lisa’s as much as the next guy, but when a science and/or engineering student decides to pour his heart out by plugging in his iPod over the loudspeakers, I don’t always want to be a part of that.

My last suggestion would be to let the athletes and students actually work out together.

A big part of the University’s plan, and a way to fundraise the $200 million-plus they need, is to let students use these facilities as well. But I have my doubts how this will work out. Athletes and coaches rightfully complain about limited areas to workout and practice, and a new facility could finally alleviate those concerns — why should they let pesky students get in the way?

But I don’t want to see NU turn into one of those schools that separates athletes and students too much. Ultimately, this responsibility falls on the students.

I had a great conversation with sports reporter Skip Myslenski the other day about how tough it is for athletes to live a normal life without everyone trying to take a picture of them or get someone in trouble.

NU students do a pretty good job of letting athletes be, although this is partly because some students have no idea we have athletes on campus. Some girl in my freshman Fall Quarter literature class didn’t know we had a football team until her junior year.

The new facilities are a great chance for NU to bring the athletes and students closer together. If the administration is serious about being “One Northwestern,” then they can take this step to back up their mantra.

I’m guilty myself of becoming a little creepy around athletes, but at least I’ve channeled my awkwardness into sports writing. But average students need to know they’re on the same playing field as the other students at NU who happen to play sports.

Print Friendly

Comments

Comments on The Daily Northwestern's articles and opinion pieces are intended to encourage productive discussion. They are moderated and may be removed for offensive or profane content.

One Response to “Nadkarni: New athletic facility should foster campus unity (and house a water park)”

  1. Dillip on November 23rd, 2012 11:01 pm

    Hi Marshall,Great site! Appreciate all the info and really lokniog forward to your book. My question; is 8 weeks long enough to prepare for a 50K? I just signed up for the Cheyenne Mountain Trail Race in Colorado Springs on April 23. This will be by far the longest distance I've ever run and I'm hoping I didn't bite off more then I can chew.My longest trails runs in the past year, where back-to-back half marathons in Boulder & Colorado Springs last October.But about two weeks after that, I developed a nagging pain in the lateral portion of my left knee(lateral tendon or ITB at knee joint), which wouldn't go away and kept me from running even a couple miles, so I stopped running completely for about 2-3 months.I just started running again within the past 2 weeks and took it very slowly the first week, doing only 2 runs of about 4 miles each with a couple days rest in between.My running log this past week was as follows: 6 miles, 3.5 miles, rest day, rest day, 7 miles, rest day, 10 miles.So far .there's no pain at all in my knee and my legs feel great!!Since I live in Boulder, I enjoy doing most of my running up Green Mountain(saw Scott Jurek & Geoff Roes up there yesterday), which means quite a bit of elevation gain/loss and can also be hard on the body(knees).Ok, I'm rambling..sorry.Back to my original question; if I use the 10% increase in weekly milage formula, do you think it's realistic for me to be able to comfortably(or reasonably) complete a 50K in 8 weeks or am I reaching too far, to soon?I'll be 46 in August and was a competitive single speed mountain bike racer up until the age of 42, but the last serious running I've done prior to the two half marathons last year, were a couple of marathons I did about 12-13 years ago.I would appreciate any advice you could lend on a milage plan, goals, & etc. My long term goal is 100 miles within the next two years, but I realize I need to learn how to walk, before I run . = )Cheers-Scott

    [Reply]

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)